Laura Glitz vs Cammy Macgregor Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
L. Glitz vs C. Macgregor

Laura Glitz

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

332

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Cammy Macgregor

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

332

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Glitz 1 - 0 Macgregor

They have played 3 sets in total, with Laura Glitz winning 2 and Cammy Macgregor winning 1. The last match between Laura Glitz and Cammy Macgregor was at the Indian Wells, 21-02-1994, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Laura Glitz getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Glitz	1
Macgregor	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q1) Indian Wells(02-21-94)

Stats

Laura Glitz

Cammy Macgregor

L. Glitz vs C. Macgregor H2H Profile

L. Glitz	Stats	C. Macgregor
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
28.07% (32-82)	Career Total W/L	48.97% (143-149)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

L. Glitz vs C. Macgregor Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Laura Glitz has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cammy Macgregor has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Laura Glitz, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cammy Macgregor has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Laura Glitz has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cammy Macgregor has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Laura Glitz has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Cammy Macgregor winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Laura Glitz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 32% (W/L 24/51), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Cammy Macgregor has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 32% (W/L 31/27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 18/22).
Player level: In the last year, Laura Glitz has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Cammy Macgregor has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Laura Glitz winning 1 times and Cammy Macgregor being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Laura Glitz winning 2 and Cammy Macgregor winning 1.
The last match between Laura Glitz and Cammy Macgregor was at the Indian Wells, 21-02-1994, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Laura Glitz getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Laura Glitz has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Cammy Macgregor has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Laura Glitz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cammy Macgregor has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Laura Glitz has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cammy Macgregor has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Laura Glitz vs Cammy Macgregor Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

L. Glitz vs C. Macgregor H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

L. Glitz	Stats	C. Macgregor
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
16	Games Won	13
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

L. Glitz Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Philadelphia - 07-11-1994
Q1 Angelica GavaldonA. Gavaldon	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
ITF Vancouver - 12-09-1994
R3 Melissa GurneyM. Gurney	L	6-2 6-7(5) 6-2	Stats
ITF Barcelona 1 25K - 23-05-1994
Q1 Mariam Ramon ClimentM. Ramon	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Lucerne - 16-05-1994
Q1 Eva MartincovaE. Martincova	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Prague - 10-05-1994
Q1 Adriana Serra ZanettiA. Serra	L	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

C. Macgregor Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Manhattan Beach - 08-08-1994
Q1 Erika De LoneE. De	L	4-6 6-0 6-3	Stats
Amelia Island - 04-04-1994
Q1 Leona LaskovaL. Laskova	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Hilton Head - 28-03-1994
Q1 Nadin ErcegovicN. Ercegovic	W	2-6 6-2 6-3	Stats
Q2 Laura GarroneL. Garrone	L	6-1 7-6(12)	Stats
Key Biscayne - 11-03-1994
Q2 Maureen DrakeM. Drake	L	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

L. Glitz vs C. Macgregor Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

L. Glitz	Stats	C. Macgregor
28.07% (32/82)	YTD Win/Loss	48.97% (143/149)
33.33% (87/174)	Sets Win/Loss	49.41% (336/344)
43.45% (1038/1351)	Games Win/Loss	49.28% (3109/3200)
32.00% (24/51)	Hard Win/Loss	47.18% (67/75)
18.75% (6/26)	Clay Win/Loss	45.00% (18/22)
40.00% (2/3)	Indoor Hard W/L	52.00% (13/12)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	51.85% (14/13)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
514.45	Average Opponent Rank	429.28
0% (0/0)	Slam W/L	37.50% (3/5)
35.82% (24/43)	Challenger W/L	50.00% (7/7)
0.00% (0/2)	Futures W/L	52.94% (27/24)
28% (32/114)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	48% (140/289)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (2/2)
53% (10/19)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	57% (21/37)
30% (10/33)	Deciding Set Win %	46% (44/96)
69% (36/25)	1st Set Won, Won Match	84% (134/113)
31% (36/11)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	16% (134/21)
9% (78/7)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (157/29)